I try not to have regrets. My philosophy is I am grateful for the life I have, and everything that has ever happened to me has led me here, so I shouldn’t regret any of it. All my successes and failures, all the joy and all the sadness, have led me here to this moment. So why would I change anything?

But here’s something I really wish I had done differently, very very differently. And that’s because my mistake cost us probably three years of services at school. I pass this on to any of you with a special needs child. Please learn from my mistake.

Each and every year, from kindergarten to through fifth grade, I would be called in for an SST meeting for Maddie. SST stands for Student Study Team. The child’s teacher is the one who calls for this meeting, and the participants are everyone who would be involved in an IEP or Individualized Education Plan meeting (that’s an official meeting to discuss the goals for the student for the year and what services will be provided and which accommodations will be made). The participants typically include the current teacher, the principal, the school psychologist, the school counselor, maybe the speech teacher and even the school’s occupational therapist. If there is an issue with academics or behavior that is not being properly addressed through other avenues, this is an opportunity for everyone at school who can help (and the parents) to brainstorm and make a plan.

Parents are invited, but if they don’t attend, the meeting will happen anyway. And each and every year I went. And each and every year we had the same discussion: why does Maddie have trouble getting work done and what are we going to do about it? Often everyone would look at me as if I had some magical answer. I looked at them an shrugged. As if! Aren’t they the experts? Had they not, in all their combined years of teaching children, ever encountered a kid like Maddie? Much to my frustration, it sure seemed as though they hadn’t.

And each and every year I left that meeting having done a heroic job of holding in the tears. I usually made it to my car before I let them flow. And they weren’t tears of joy. One particularly difficult meeting took place when Maddie was in second grade. The head of the special ed department, a very experienced and well-respected German woman who had actually started the program at this school decades before, used words like “odd” and “stubborn” to describe my child. It was terrible. Isn’t she supposed to have a special knowledge of and compassion for kids like mine? Didn’t she realize that this stubbornness, while undeniable, was a symptom of a larger problem and not just the behavior of a defiant child? I pointed that out every year, but nobody seemed to get it.

And this is at a school that’s known for its special services. It’s a public school, though, and even thought it’s exceptional in many ways, it has limited resources for kids like mine. The kids who receive services are typically either struggling terribly in math or reading, or have more severe cognitive delays. Maddie always tested very well and was clearly bright. But her varying performance day to day was actually a detriment to our cause: because on some days she was so capable, it seemed to everyone that she ought to be just as capable every other day as well. She must just be stubborn. She was stubborn, indeed, but at least I could recognize the source of her inflexibility at that time was the stress she experienced just trying to cope with a normal school day. She was unequipped for the rapid transitions that occurred each day, and the social requirements were far beyond her development.

In third grade, Maddie had a teacher that was new to the school. She had been teaching for over a decade, however, and was the first teacher to say, “Let’s get this kid assessed. She needs help.” She might have even used the word “ridiculous” in reference to the lack of services Maddie was receiving.

So after that year’s SST, the school began the assessment process. The school psychologist performed a number of tests to make her own evaluation, and she gave questionnaires to the parents and the teacher that covered a wide variety of behaviors. The goal was to identify a particular problem area that might qualify the child for services.

After several weeks, we reconvened to go over the results. (Keep in mind, this was a year before we had an autism diagnosis from her psychologist.)

The big reveal: She did not qualify for services. Her speech was fine (and a speech issue is usually a requirement for most services). And there was no diagnosis of autism. And that was because of me and me alone.

It turns out the questionnaires given to the psychologist, the teacher, and parents all have to match up reasonably well. If one person reports a very different set of behaviors, the other two questionnaires don’t hold up. And I was that one person.

I was heartbroken. We walked out of that meeting with no more help, no more answers, no more anything than we had when we walked in, and it was all my fault. Talk about regrets.

I think I was just so used to my own kid that some of the behaviors that others saw as outside of the norm seemed kind of normal to me. What did I know? She was just Maddie. I don’t think I was misreporting anything on purpose. I don’t think I was trying to paint a picture of Maddie that was rosier than reality. But that’s exactly what I did. And so we continued on the same path for the next three years, with Maddie struggling to live up to her potential at school, and with teachers who wanted to help her but didn’t know how.

When Maddie started flailing terribly in sixth grade, I had another chance, and I took it. Maddie was going to be the neediest kid they’d ever seen. Well, that’s an exaggeration, but I most certainly made sure that if I was on the fence about something, I erred on the side of “problematic.” I was honest. Brutally honest. Honest with the school and honest with myself. And no way was I going to let that travesty happen again. Remarkably (haha, not really), this time my reporting was more on par with that of the teacher and psychologist.

As a result, she finally got what she had needed all along. And after a disastrous entry into middle school, Maddie began to flourish, or at least cope better than she had been. We ended up moving her to private school the following year, ironically only after we had finally got her situated properly at the public school. But I guess at that point I saw more clearly what she needed.

If there’s one thing I learned from our experience, it’s that any time I’m revealing any of Maddie’s challenges at school, my goal has to be to get her services. I’m not worried about how she comes off on paper, except when it comes to getting her services. I wish I had undersold her abilities rather than the opposite. It didn’t help anybody.

Perhaps I was in denial that first time. I don’t know. But because of what I consider to be one of my biggest failures as her mother, it is my mission to tell everybody I ever meet who has a young kid struggling at school, and who may be a candidate for extra help:

Do not overstate your kid’s abilities. Do not worry about the picture you are painting of your child. Your goal is to get the help they need. Forget trying to impress anybody. Forget making excuses in your head for why your kid is a certain way. And don’t be in denial yourself. Face the reality of your child, and fight fight fight for help. Expect and demand everything that could help your child.

I know I recently said I wasn’t in the business of giving advice. Look at this not so much as advice but wisdom gained from my own mistakes. I hope somebody else can learn from mine and save themselves some time.

Here’s another regret of mine: I wish I had been a squeaker wheel. That’s a topic for another time.